The second reason why Asia will not
dominate relates to the first. Militarily, the US and
Europe are very much
ahead of Asia, and this will remain the case in the 21st
century.
Although military (......................) should be
replaced somewhat by economic (.....................) as
the main source of power in the 21st century, man is a very
unpredictable creature, the
world is still an
unstable place, and the need for military
capability will still be required for
insurance against the Iraqs and the North
Koreans of this world. And just as Great Britain
ruled the waves in the 19th
century, and as (.................) Americana’s defence (......................)
protected much of the
world in the latter half of the 20th century, a global ‘cop on the
(...............)’, or a
global policeman, is still required to ensure peace and (....................).
1) beat, 2) capability,
3) leverage, 4) pax,
5) stability, 6) umbrella
And l just can’t
foresee nations of Asia being in a position to co-operate on defence
matters
in the foreseeable future: Japan’s constitution effectively prevents
its armed
forces from (..................)
outside Japan except on extremely (...................)
peacekeeping
operations; and
there are more territorial (.....................) in this
part of the world than in any
other, for example, the Spratly Islands; and also
China’s intentions on military matters
are (................).
* Spratly
Islands 南沙諸島
1) disputes,
2) limited, 3) unclear,
4) venturing
Now, all this means
that there is an incentive for each option to look after its individual
defence
requirements individually, and not (...................), and the US will continue to
be
involved in the defence needs of
region. It won’t want to, but if it doesn’t.
the result
may be instability in
the region (..................) to US interests, and
in a region that the US
wants to be part
of, even though it will find it (....................)
difficult to be part of this region
in the future.
1) collectively,
2) increasingly, 3) vital
|